Showing posts with label Chetan Bhagat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chetan Bhagat. Show all posts

Saturday, January 2, 2010

The Movie - The Book and Chetan`s 4th Mistake

Dear Brother Chetan Bhiya,

I am not a big fan of your books clearly. I am a big fan of English movie and Politics of India. I am concerned with lot of Indians who are upset from the system called Indian politics and parts running under it.( Thats right I am just another Indian)

Till now I clearly see you as a businessman who sells books which he writes for fun!.Your books are demeaning to educated (or education taking girls) and supports to grow filthiness amongst youngster by telling them "how to use education as a shield of sex? "

Now, As my oath to help Indians Let me help you by following :-

This is what brought you in mess. You think you are PRO writer (language wise its true but legality wise it is not).

4-a) If you want credit of Movie you should have gone to Censer board when Script and Story were passed by writer.

4-b) You should have clearly mentioned your share of credit either in terms of money or in terms of placing the name of book or author.

4-c) Patent of FPS is under Author Suppression Act. Which means "Writing Publishing Edited Writing and Edited publishing is prohibited.. . .No Claw Regarding making movie on it.

If you File a case your weak points will be :-

A) Your weak patent. ( 4-C )
B) You came late to take story credit.
C) Still if Court takes your case then your FPS patent has patents of
i) "Names of Characters" : 15%
ii) "Scenario and Be ground lines" : 30%
iii) "Exciting Scenes " : 15%
iv) " Name of Patent Objection" : 10%
v)" Story line " : 30%

So, C-i,C-iii,C-iv are not in your favor i.e totally 40% is not stolen from you. Also I am not including (C-iii) as I am not sure they have shown the "Neha with top off! " of your book in movie. Still your opponents get 40% not copied.

Law says : If book is copied for more then 75% then its copyright infringement case. Name of Characters and Story line have very much details which can be removed by placing the following para in movie
" Any and all names, characters, pictures, scenes, places, locations, locales, business establishments, organizations, associations, groups, entities, dominions, states, nations, governments, beliefs, circumstances, conditions, and events portrayed in this movie are either fictitious or fictitiously used. Any resemblance to real or actual person (living or dead) are pure coincidence. Any resemblance to real or actual character, characters, picture, pictures, scene, scenes, place, places, location, locations, locale, locales, business establishment, business establishments, organization, organizations, association, associations, group, groups, entity, entities, dominion, dominions, state, states, nation, nations, government, governments, belief, beliefs, circumstance, circumstances, condition, conditions, event, or events that exist, exists, existed, have existed, or will exist are pure coincidence. Any resemblance to reality is pure coincidence."


Now you have only 60% true hold (out of which 30% more can be taken if you take "exciting scene and turning points " ).

As far as " court outside settlement " is concerned , I know you are a good business man and you have good hold in International market you will come to draft some rout out.
Also I would like to suggest that "be legally strong for books you wrote".

Regards,
Mayank

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Danik Bhaskar not responding


After reading the third editorial of Chetan Bhagat in Dainik bhasker ripped my heart.Only thing that comes in my mind is "how a general man`s newspaper ,Dainik Bhasker,become biased of a person who doesnot live in India.".I wrote the reply to the editorial,email address of Dainik Bhasker, as mentioned in news paper but all returned is mail delivery failure.So copy of my mail is present in public inorder so that you can read and understand.I do not expect Sir Chetan Bhagat to read this off his busy schedule.But it will be great if some one send it to him.


Date:- 05 /11 / 2009
Sir,
Before I write,I must tell you that I do not hate Chetan Bhagat or Bhasker.All I want to clarify is "Cheta Bhagat to bhasker is like ice-cream with pepper".

I grew up reading Bhasker newspaper.I live in Indore.I am a different student.I read politics and I take " My India very seriously".I had read almost all articles of editorial Bhasker.I am a web-developer so I know what Internet has.I had gone through the constitution of india superficially and I am dam sure that what "Chetan Bhagat " wrote is totally ir-rivalent to any thing in India or Indians.
That guy wrote few novels having porn-touch in it.those books were liked by those who were literate and those who belong to higher middle class to high class society.

Bhaskar is common man`s newspaper.
Reach of it is of more then millions.
Chetan Bhagat passed out of IIM and since then trying to become an NRI.Our bad luck he never become succesful and his books,insted of famous in US/UK,become famous in India.Then recessions and all made him visit India more frequently,where he was worshiped by the upper class and middle class society.

Sir,two things from this point.
1) Chetan Bhagat`s Case:-
read his articles yourself.He talks of things that are not in relation of India or co-relates about India.In India since 2002 Panchayat raj has been established and emphasized.He do not know about them.We all know what a perfect city/country means.Modeling them over India do not make any sense.
Involving facts and figures strengthen the trust over article.His article are plane and not a simple name of any office is involved.

If you still want to make him write for Bhaskar Editorial please message him,"India is a Agr-Based-Nation. People here work harder to protect religion(like it or not).Also, tell him to read about Panchayat raj and panchayat raj system".

2) Do not printed internet:-
We all know what internet is.its same thing as news paper without a paper.As Times of India`s editor wrote "Now is the time for print media to go to next level".It clearly means that print media should not be influnced by any phony born on internet.You have your own system of working all you need is to improve quality not increase number of work force.

I am too young to be harsh on any one.But dam! sure I can have a view.
Apologies to anyone who has been hurt.

Regards,
mayank shukla
indore